Discord Chat Logs: On the Self-Contradiction that "Freemasons Support Enlightenment"
Feeling that Freemasonry is obviously not leftists, not only are they completely inclined to the Mystical Worldview, close to the Values of Ancient Greek philosophers in all aspects, but also in terms of "Freedom" views actually only advocate "Freedom of conscience", compared are much more moderate than Puritans. If the Puritans were Rightists, it's certainly difficult to say that Freemasonry is Anti-Monarchist Leftists.
It is certainly incorrect for Liu and other articles to claim that Freemasonry was vigilant by conservatives for being Anti-Monarchist, advocating Republicanism and even “Enlightenment”. In fact, it’s not hard to understand why Freemasonry is opposed by Conspiracy Theorists—Fundamentalist Christians are generally wary of Paganism and Mysticism, Occultism, they see Paganism and Satanism as more dangerous than Leftist and Jacobinism, and they see the latter as essentially part of the former on Theological Premises, arguing that Jacobinism is “Satanic.” This is for Theological reasons, not Political reasons. This is logically coherent and plausible, even though it seems unreasonable the Non-Christians who are affected by them, such as the Falun Gongists.
The vigilance of Christian Conservativists certainly does not prove that Freemasonry is an Anti-Monarchist Leftist Organization, for the vigilance stems from the Theological aspect, just as Christian vigilance against Islam does not prove that Islam is left.
(中間的無関討論略)
All the slurs of the Middle Ages are basically pure fabrications of the Jacobin mobs. And there is basically no reason to prove that most Philosophers from Ancient Greece to the Renaissance were opposed to the Monarchy, and even if they opposed the Middle Ages from the perspective of Classical Society, it must be admitted that the Middle Ages were countless times better than Modern Atheist Societies.
I still believe that “Freemasons support for Enlightenment” is self-contradictory, because “Enlightenment” not only does not represent en-lighten-ment, but happens to be the opposite of the Ancient Principles of Wisdom and Ancient-Greek~Renaissance Values revealed by Mysticism, the Science of Mysticism is superstition in the eyes of Atheists. The Purpose of "Enlightenment"(Unlightenment) and Modern Atheistic Science is not to reveal the Laws behind everything to find God, but on the contrary, the Core of Atheistic Science is to prove that the Universe is random, without regularity, and therefore without God, they are based on Nominalism and contradict all Idealism.
Any Classical Political Philosophy are necessarily Reactionary, the Hellenistic-Renaissance and Medieval conflict is far less than the conflict between Traditionalism and Atheist Modernism, and anyone who claims that a Modern, Spiritless Egalitarian Fallen Society conforms to the Principles of Greco-Roman and Renaissance is blatantly unpractical.
The Middle Ages were certainly more in line with these Classical Principles, and it was precisely these Greco-Roman Classical Principles that inspired people to move towards Reactionism and Traditionalism. If someone agrees with these Classical Principles but opposes the Middle Ages, it can only be attributed to Paganism reasons, but there is clearly no reason to believe that Modern Atheistic Societies are better than the Middle Ages.
Almost the vast majority of the reasons against the Middle Ages are basically Jacobinist deceit and empty accusations, but we only need to trace back to the root cause that at the heart of these accusations is hatred of all Truth and the Traditional Social Order.
If the Middle Ages were opposed from the perspective of Greco-Roman Paganic Societies, we can hardly believe that such a position could be reconciled with Modernity. As far as I know, Emperor Julian often claimed that Christians were “Atheists,” and if even Christians so, it is really hard to imagine that they could possibly accept the Real Atheists of Modern Jacobinism.